Fiscal Year 2027 Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Bill

Appropriations Bill MarkupsHouse Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development, and Related Agencies · 2026-05-15 · 119th Congress
The House Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development met to mark up the Fiscal Year 2027 Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies appropriations bill, totaling $58.5 billion [0:06:27]. Begins at 0:05:59
Transcript
Highlights

Title

Subcommittee marks up and advances FY2027 Energy and Water bill

Purpose

The House Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development met to mark up the Fiscal Year 2027 Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies appropriations bill, totaling $58.5 billion0:06:27. Members debated the bill's balance between defense and non-defense funding, cuts to clean energy and nonproliferation programs, and rising utility costs, before voting to send the bill to the full committee. Begins at0:05:59

Who spoke

Chairman Chuck Fleischmann (R-TN)0:05:59: Opened the markup, outlining the bill's $58.5 billion total, a $461 million increase over FY20260:06:27, including $27.1 billion for the National Nuclear Security Administration0:06:50, $8.5 billion for the Office of Science0:08:43, $9.8 billion for the Army Corps of Engineers0:09:10, and $1.8 billion for the Bureau of Reclamation0:09:33; said he sought a bipartisan bill0:11:01 and later moved to advance it0:43:17.

Ranking Member Marcy Kaptur (D-OH)0:11:31: Called the process "rather partisan"0:12:19, displayed charts on gas prices and past recessions tied to oil dependence0:13:45, and said defense programs rise $774 million (2%) while non-defense is cut $1.8 billion (6%)0:16:500:17:13; cited a $1.3 billion (40%) cut to critical materials and energy innovation0:17:13, a $252 million (12%) cut to nuclear nonproliferation0:18:34, and full elimination of FUSRAP funding0:18:57; said DOE has terminated over $9 billion for 300+ projects0:20:29 and urged colleagues to oppose the bill as written0:21:00.

Full Committee Chairman Tom Cole (R-OK)0:21:26: Praised the bill's focus on energy dominance, critical minerals, and the Genesis Mission0:21:50; stressed that subcommittee chair-ranking member relationships drive real negotiations0:23:32 and noted 11 of 12 bills passed last cycle under this model0:23:58.

Full Committee Ranking Member Rosa DeLauro (D-CT)0:26:43: Opposed the bill, saying it raises energy costs for middle-class families0:28:25 and that inflation has outpaced wage growth for the first time since 20230:28:51; cited the $1.3 billion (40%) cut to critical minerals and energy innovation0:29:12, a $282 million (12%) cut to defense nuclear nonproliferation0:30:01, and an $863 million (10%) cut to the Office of Environmental Management affecting cleanup sites in Washington, South Carolina, Idaho, and Tennessee0:31:13; urged a "no" vote0:32:04.

Vice Chairman Michael Cloud (R-TX)0:32:31: Praised the chairman's work traveling the country and prioritizing energy production amid competition with China0:32:57; highlighted investments in nuclear energy, quantum computing, and the Bureau of Reclamation0:33:50; later moved that the bill be favorably reported0:43:17.

Rep. Mike Levin (D-CA)0:34:21: Said he was disappointed a bipartisan bill wasn't reached0:34:21; argued China is now leading in clean energy manufacturing and deployment0:34:51; cited about 180,000 clean energy jobs wiped out or delayed nationally, representing enough capacity for 14.6 million homes0:36:15; said unsubsidized wind and solar are cheaper than new coal or gas generation0:37:35.

Rep. Frank Mrvan (D-IN)0:38:33: Said Northwest Indiana families have seen utility rates jump more than 26%0:39:00; criticized a $50 million cut to ARPA-E affecting Purdue University Northwest steel research0:39:26; noted the canceled Northwest Indiana hydrogen hub would have created 12,000 direct jobs0:39:54; flagged a more than 50% cut to Indiana Harbor and Burns Waterway Harbor funding0:41:09; described a $100 million cost imposed on ratepayers from a mandate to keep a coal plant open0:41:55.

Key moments

Kaptur said gas prices have risen to an average $4.50 per gallon amid the Middle East conflict, presenting historical charts on oil-linked recessions0:13:45.

Kaptur detailed a series of cuts she opposes: $1.3 billion (40%) to critical materials and energy innovation, $50 million (14%) to ARPA-E, $25 million to grid deployment programs, and $252 million (12%) to nuclear nonproliferation0:17:130:18:34.

DeLauro said the president's actions toward Iran have driven gasoline costs up by 40%0:30:01.

Cole publicly credited the Fleischmann-Kaptur relationship for prior success, noting their last work product earned 419 votes on the House floor0:26:14.

Levin said roughly 180,000 clean energy jobs have been wiped out or delayed over the past year, representing projects that would have powered 14.6 million homes0:36:41.

Mrvan contrasted a $100 million ratepayer-funded mandate to keep an Indiana coal plant open with the Energy Secretary's celebration of new natural gas plants opening in Pennsylvania and Ohio the same week0:42:16.

The subcommittee approved the bill on a voice vote with no amendments offered, then voted to favorably report it to the full committee0:43:170:43:34.

The subcommittee received nearly 6,700 member requests for community project and programmatic funding, which staff attempted to address for both parties0:10:03.

Metadata

CommitteeHouse Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development, and Related Agencies
Chamber / CongressHouse · 119th Congress
Date2026-05-15
TypeMarkup
Witnesses
(none listed in event metadata)
Videoyoutube
Transcript88 caption blocks · 6,040 words · 0:44:18 runtime
EventCongress.gov 119283